Technology & Utility
20%Protocol architecture, innovation, scalability, security, decentralisation, developer activity and real-world usefulness.
Every asset we track is evaluated by an AI research model against six criteria. The model never decides the final number: it scores each criterion from 0–100, and our backend applies fixed weights to compute the overall score. That keeps results consistent, auditable and comparable across thousands of assets. Current scoring version: v1.0.
Protocol architecture, innovation, scalability, security, decentralisation, developer activity and real-world usefulness.
Founder and core developer track record, transparency, delivery against roadmap, governance and institutional credibility.
Circulating supply, dilution, unlock schedules, insider and VC allocation, emissions, vesting and token utility.
Active users, transactions, TVL, applications, integrations, exchange availability, community growth and network revenue.
Investor quality, capital raised, institutional backing and confirmed partnerships — announcements alone do not count.
Upside versus downside: valuation, sector growth, narrative, liquidity, regulatory, unlock, competition and execution risk.
Overall score = the sum of each criterion score multiplied by its weight, rounded to the nearest whole number. Weights always add up to 100%, so a coin that scores 80 on every criterion receives exactly 80 overall.
Technology & Utility × 20% Team & Execution × 15% Tokenomics × 20% Adoption & Ecosystem × 15% Funding & Partnerships × 10% Growth Potential & Risk × 20%
Each analysis carries a confidence level from 0–100 reflecting how much verifiable evidence the model found. When information is missing — an anonymous team, no audited contracts, undisclosed funding — the model records the gap explicitly and lowers both the relevant criterion score and confidence rather than guessing. Every coin page lists the data gaps behind its score.
Market data (price, market cap, volume, supply, all-time highs) comes from public market data providers and refreshes continuously. Qualitative research draws on project documentation, developer activity, community metrics and exchange listings available at analysis time. Scores are re-generated on a rolling schedule and stored append-only, so the full score history for every asset is preserved.
AI research can be incomplete or wrong. Scores are a starting point for your own research, not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Nothing on CryptoAIGem is financial advice.